Defined macros become undefined - MFCU vs SFCU

From Verific Design Automation FAQ
Revision as of 10:33, 11 June 2021 by Hoa (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Q: I have macros defined in a separate input file. Why does Verific analyzer complain about "undefined macros" in SystemVerilog mode but not in Verilog 2K mode?

SystemVerilog introduces "compilation unit." In general, constructs defined in one compilation unit is not visible in a different compilation unit.

The default mode in SystemVerilog is "single-file compilation unit." The default mode in Verilog 2K mode is "multiple-file compilation unit."

In SystemVerilog mode, in order for one file sees macros defined in another file, one needs to specify "multiple-file compilation unit" mode.

  $ cat foo.v
  `define ZERO 0

  $ cat bar.v
  module test (output oo);
  assign oo = `ZERO;
  endmodule
  
  $ verific-linux
  -- (c) Copyright 1999 - 2018 Verific Design Automation Inc. All rights reserved
  % analyze '''-verilog_2000''' foo.v bar.v
  -- Analyzing Verilog file 'foo.v' (VERI-1482)
  -- Analyzing Verilog file 'bar.v' (VERI-1482)
  % cleanup -all -static
  INFO: All parse-trees and netlists were deleted (CMD-2055)
  % analyze '''-sysv''' foo.v bar.v
  -- Analyzing Verilog file 'foo.v' (VERI-1482)
  -- Analyzing Verilog file 'bar.v' (VERI-1482)
  bar.v(2): WARNING: use of undefined macro 'ZERO' (VERI-1158)
  bar.v(2): ERROR: syntax error near ';' (VERI-1137)
  bar.v(3): ERROR: module 'test' ignored due to previous errors (VERI-1072)
  ERROR: analyze: failed (CMD-1014)
  % cleanup -all -static
  INFO: All parse-trees and netlists were deleted (CMD-2055)
  % analyze '''-sysv -mfcu''' foo.v bar.v
  -- Analyzing Verilog file 'foo.v' (VERI-1482)
  -- Analyzing Verilog file 'bar.v' (VERI-1482)
  % exit

  $