Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Verific Design Automation FAQ
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* [[Verilog ports being renamed | Why are the ports in original Verilog file renamed to p1, p2, ....?]]
 
* [[Verilog ports being renamed | Why are the ports in original Verilog file renamed to p1, p2, ....?]]
 
* [[Design with System Verilog and Verilog 2001 files | For a design consisting of a mixture of Verilog 2001 and SystemVerilog input files, should I parse all the files as SystemVerilog?]]
 
* [[Design with System Verilog and Verilog 2001 files | For a design consisting of a mixture of Verilog 2001 and SystemVerilog input files, should I parse all the files as SystemVerilog?]]
* [[Design with VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 files | VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 each has its own IEEE set. How do I analyze/elaborate a design with a mixture of files of different VHDL dialects (1993 and 2008)?]]
+
* [[Design with VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 files | VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 each has its own IEEE library set. How do I analyze/elaborate a design with a mixture of files of different VHDL dialects (1993 and 2008)?]]
 
* [[How to get module ports from Verilog parsetree | From the Verilog parsetree, how can I get the ports of a module?]]
 
* [[How to get module ports from Verilog parsetree | From the Verilog parsetree, how can I get the ports of a module?]]
  

Revision as of 16:43, 22 July 2016

General


VHDL, Verilog, Liberty, EDIF

Output

TCL, Perl, Python, Java