Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Verific Design Automation FAQ
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* [[Design with System Verilog and Verilog 2001 files | Verilog: For a design consisting of a mixture of Verilog 2001 and SystemVerilog input files, should I parse all the files as SystemVerilog?]]
 
* [[Design with System Verilog and Verilog 2001 files | Verilog: For a design consisting of a mixture of Verilog 2001 and SystemVerilog input files, should I parse all the files as SystemVerilog?]]
 
* [[How to get module ports from Verilog parsetree | Verilog: From the Verilog parsetree, how can I get the ports of a module?]]
 
* [[How to get module ports from Verilog parsetree | Verilog: From the Verilog parsetree, how can I get the ports of a module?]]
 +
* [[Constant expression replacement | Verilog: Does Verific replace constant expressions with their respective values?]]
 
* [[SystemVerilog "std" package | Verilog: Support for SystemVerilog semaphore/process/mailbox constructs.]]
 
* [[SystemVerilog "std" package | Verilog: Support for SystemVerilog semaphore/process/mailbox constructs.]]
 
* [[Design with VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 files | VHDL: VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 each has its own IEEE library set. How do I analyze/elaborate a design with a mixture of files of different VHDL dialects (1993 and 2008)?]]
 
* [[Design with VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 files | VHDL: VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 each has its own IEEE library set. How do I analyze/elaborate a design with a mixture of files of different VHDL dialects (1993 and 2008)?]]

Revision as of 16:28, 1 August 2016

General

VHDL, Verilog (and System Verilog), Liberty, EDIF

Output

TCL, Perl, Python, Java